As a theorist (unlike many of my observing friends), I don’t make the trip to Mauna Kea or down to Chile to collect data for my research. I can work from the comfort of my office (during the day… mostly) right here in Santa Cruz! But as an astronomer, I very much rely on those observations to test my own models and motivate new theories, and to progress the field as a whole. As a young astronomer, I’m excited to learn as much as I can about the observing process. So when the chance to observe with a collaborator Sandy Leggett at Gemini North came up, I couldn’t pass it up!
The Weirdest Thing at 14,000 Feet
At Gemini, we actually observed from the summit (many telescopes, like Keck, actually leave the astronomers at sea level, where there’s plenty of oxygen for breathing… and thinking). At 14,000 feet, you can get altitude sickness, feel lightheaded, and generally think a little slower. But the weirdest thing is definitely this: at this altitude, even though you’re in a place with some of the clearest skies on Earth, you can’t actually see any more stars than from Cambridge, Mass. Your retinas are really sensitive to the oxygen and adapt really, really slowly when you walk out of the observatory. Crazy, right?
Gemini is a little different from many telescopes: most of the observing is scheduled as “queue mode” instead of more traditional classical observing mode. In classical observing mode, you apply for telescope time to observe objects for your project; if your research is deemed worthy by the Telescope Allocation Committee (TAC), you’ll get a few nights on the telescope. You observe objects for your own projects during your observing nights. (See Elisabeth’s astrobite for an overview of the many things you have to think about to plan out a classical-observing night!)
Instead, at telescopes like Gemini, the observers for the night will observe the targets in the “queue,” not their own science targets. (Other telescopes that do some or most of the observing in queue mode are the GTC and Paranal Observatory, and now ALMA). When you apply for time, you apply to observe a set of specific targets. The Telescope Allocation Committee chooses which programs are worthy of telescope time; they decide which observations should be observed based on scientific merit, the conditions needed to observe the target, and the location in the sky (you can’t over-schedule a region of the sky because each part only rises for part of the year). Each night, the queue organizer puts the highest priority observations into the “queue.”
Sandy explained to me that this allows telescope time to be used most effectively given the conditions each night. While Mauna Kea usually has great weather (that’s why a dozen telescopes are up there!) the weather is definitely better on some nights than others. The main categories of weather that effect your observations are clouds, turbulence in the atmosphere, and wind.
For some observations, a thin layer of cirrus clouds might not matter. For others, you might be able to observe in poor ‘seeing’ conditions (seeing describes the amount of turbulence in your atmosphere; poor seeing will make a more blurred image than good seeing). Pointing straight into the wind may stop you from observing a target because too much wind could move or damage the telescope. Some observations may only be possible on the best nights with no clouds and excellent seeing. Each night, there will be 3-4 queues to choose from based on the weather conditions; as observers, we had to pick the best-matching queue and if the conditions changed partway through the night, switch between the different queues.
This scheduling process allows the telescope time to be used efficiently. With queue observing, you never waste a clear, perfect night observing bright calibration stars; you observe the trickiest objects that need the best conditions. Likewise, a slightly cloudy night won’t be wasted trying to observe a target that really needed great weather.
This setup was great for me as a student learning about observing. It allowed me to see a huge variety of observations: quasars, galaxies, comets, stars, and planetary systems. I got to use all the instruments currently installed at Gemini North: a multi-object spectrograph GMOS, an imager NIRI, a integral field spectrograph NIFS, and the adaptive optics system Altair.
Have you ever been observing before? What do you think the advantages/disadvantages of queue and classical observations are?
Latest posts by Caroline Morley (see all)
- Forming Mercury and Iron-rich Exoplanets – May 9, 2013
- The First Direct Spectroscopy of Multiple Planets in One System – March 15, 2013
- The Frequency of (Habitable?) Planets Around M dwarfs – February 14, 2013