Searching for Additional Planets in the EPOXI Data

Summary

In a previous post, I described NASA’s EPOXI mission to use the Deep Impact spacecraft to detect transiting exoplanets. In this paper, the authors use EPOXI data to search for additional planets in five known exoplanetary systems. The planetary systems investigated are HAT-P-4, TrES-3, TrES-2, WASP-3, and HAT-P-7. The systems are named after the surveys that detected them: the HATNet (Hungarian Automated Telescope Network) Project, the Trans-Atlantic Exoplanet Survey, and the Wide Angle Search for Planets. Although the authors do not find any new candidate planets in these systems, they are able to constrain the presence of other transiting planets in the systems.

Methodology

As Ellie explained in her discussion of the Kepler mission, a transiting planets is detected due to the dip in the apparent brightness of the host star. Accordingly, Ballard et al. look for the signatures of additional planets in these systems by monitoring the brightness of their target stars for approximately two-week intervals and searching for drops in brightness that are not due to the known planet. They did not find any evidence of additional transits, but there could be other planets in these systems that did not transit during their observations or produced transits that were too small for Ballard et al. to detect. In order to determine their sensitivity to transiting planets with different radii and orbital periods, the authors inject model planetary transits into their acquired light curves and then determine whether their software would be able to detect those planets.

Results

As shown in the figure, the authors would have been sensitive to transiting Saturn-sized planets with orbital periods of 0.5 to 2.5 days for all of the stars and with longer orbital periods (up to 7 days) for the stars with the most complete light curves. In the HAT-P-4, TrES-3, and WASP-3 systems the authors would also have been able to detect sub-Saturn-sized companions, and in the TrES-2 system, they could have detected planets as small as Neptune. They also constrain the radii of planets in orbital resonances with the known planets. For instance, the authors would have been sensitive to 65% of 4 REarth planets in the 3:2 resonance with TrES-2b and to >90% of 5 REarth planets in the 3:2 or 2:1 resonance. These detection limits and the other limits discussed in the paper allow the authors to place significant constraints on the radii and orbital periods of additional planets in these systems.

Excerpt of Figure 3 of Ballard et al. 2011

Sensitivity to additional transiting planets in the HAT-P-4 with a range of radii. The diamonds mark the radii and orbital period for the injected planets and the contours indicate the relative error on the recovered planetary radius for 95% of the simulations. Looking at planets with an orbital period of ~2.3 days, we see that the radius of a >7 REarth planet is detected with <10% error in 95% of trials. If the planet radius is decreased to ~6 REarth, then the error in the recovered radius increases to between 10% and 50%. This figure is the top panel of Figure 3 of Ballard et al. 2011

About Courtney Dressing

I am a fourth-year graduate student in the Astronomy Department at Harvard University. My research interests include exoplanets, habitability, and astrobiology. I received a master's degree in astronomy and astrophysics from Harvard University and a bachelor's degree in astrophysical sciences from Princeton University. At Princeton, I worked with Jill Knapp to study the magnetic activity of M dwarfs with white dwarf companions and with Dave Spiegel to model the habitability of terrestrial exoplanets. For my senior thesis, I worked with Ed Turner, Michael McElwain, and the SEEDS (Strategic Explorations of Exoplanets and Disks with Subaru) collaboration to directly image young Jovian exoplanets using the Subaru telescope. At Harvard, I am working with Dave Charbonneau to study the properties, frequency, and detectability of small planets orbiting small stars.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Review Article: Protoplanetary Disks and Their Evolution « astrobites - [...] a regular reader of astrobites, you may have noticed that exoplanets are a hot field in astronomy now (yes,…

Leave a Reply

Inviting all undergrads to Finding, Choosing, or Changing Advisors: an Astrobites Panel Webinar on March 9 at 8pm ET. RSVP here!