- Title: GRB Beaming and Gravitational-Wave Observations
- Authors: Hsin-Yu Chen, Daniel E. Holz
- First Author’s Institution: University of Chicago
- Paper Status: Published in Physical Review Letters
Gamma ray satellite missions, like Swift and Fermi, detect short hard gamma ray bursts (SGRBs) a handful of times per month. SGRBs are flashes of high-energy gamma rays that last about a second. They are probably created when two neutron stars or a neutron star and a black hole merge. Violent stellar mergers like this don’t just shine brightly in the gamma ray spectrum. They also send out faint wiggles in space-time, known as gravitational waves.
So SGRBs should be detectable by LIGO, the Caltech-MIT gravitational wave observatory. That is, detectable if the stars are close enough to us for the very faint gravitational waves to register in these detectors. But during the most-recent LIGO observing run, covering about a year from 2009-2010, LIGO detected precisely zero gravitational waves coincident with a satellite-detected SGRB.* Never fear, null data are still data! Chen & Holz use this lack of detections to place a lower limit on the jet beaming angle of SGRBs.
The gamma rays in an SGRB don’t shine in all directions, but are instead confined to narrow beams,** as shown in the cartoon.
For most SGRBs, the jet opening angle is impossible to determine, as this astrobite explains. But a few optical observations hint at opening angles of <10°, and simulations of accretion disks show jets forming with angles of <30°.
How do Chen & Holz use a lack of gravitational wave detections to place a new and independent limit on the beaming angle?
Here’s a thought experiment: if the beaming angle is large, then the intrinsic rate of SGRBs in the local universe must be very close to the observed rate, because nearly every one that “goes off” has some light pointing in our direction. But if the beaming angle is small, then the intrinsic rate of SGRBs must be very much greater than the observed rate. At some point, as we imagine pushing the beaming angle to smaller and smaller values, the intrinsic rate of SGRBs gets so large that one must have occurred within LIGO’s observing volume during its last run.
And since LIGO didn’t see any gravitational waves in that run, Chen & Holz are able to place a lower limit on the average beaming angle. They estimate it must be >2°, if they assume realistic black hole / neutron star masses. This isn’t very constrictive, but it is consistent with the other methods of determining the beaming angle described above.
With this independent constraint on the the beaming angle, Chen & Holz are able to place lower limits on event rates for gravitational wave detections of SGRBs by future, more-sensitive gravitational wave detectors. Their results are very optimistic. Even with the low sensitivity expected when Advanced LIGO begins observing in 2015, the first detection is expected in less than 16 months.
* Actually, no gravitational waves of any type have been detected during the entire first decade of LIGO’s operation. This silence, however, is not surprising given the threshold sensitivity of this type of detector. Note, the new more-sensitive generation of detectors (Advanced LIGO) will begin operating in 2015, with a detectable volume about 1000 times greater than that of the first-generation detectors.
** The beaming angle of the gamma rays is the same as the opening angle of the jet because the jet is moving at nearly the speed of light. An effect called relativistic beaming causes the gamma rays to be emitted primarily in the forward direction. Often “opening angle” and “beaming angle” are used interchangeably in the context of SGRBs.