Authors: Debra Meloy Elmegreen, Bruce G. Elmegreen
First Author’s Institution: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vassar College, Poughkeepsie, NY
Status: Accepted to ApJL, open access on arXiv
Introduction: Green Peas and blueberries
In recent years, large galaxy surveys have given us an unprecedented look at galaxies at a wide range of redshifts. This has led to the discovery of a bewildering number of new galaxy types—a Galaxy Zoo, if you will. These galaxy subpopulations are important to study because they can provide direct links between the high-redshift universe and the galaxies we see today. (Just to refresh your memory, redshift is both a measure of distance and age, so high redshift means far away, when the universe was older.)
For example, the “Green Pea” galaxies were discovered by citizen scientists, who noticed that these galaxies don’t look much like traditional early-type (elliptical) or late-type (spiral) galaxies. (See this page for a quick primer on the differences between some galaxy classifications.) Instead, these Green Peas look… well, small and green (Figure 1).
This led to a discussion forum thread title (and eventually a Hubble Space Telescope proposal subtitle): “Give peas a chance.” The name stuck, and perhaps more importantly, Green Peas were found to be low-redshift analogues to high-redshift galaxies called Lyman-alpha emitters, which give us important information about the epoch of reionization.
But Green Peas aren’t the only weird galaxies out there. More recently, even lower-mass galaxies have been discovered. These galaxies, called “blueberries,” are similar to the Green Pea galaxies but fainter and with more intense star formation. (I personally think this is a poor choice of name because actual blueberries are more massive than actual peas, but they do look like blueberries (Figure 2). And maybe the people who named them were just really hungry?)
Today’s paper reports the discovery of even lower-mass galaxies, which the authors (somewhat more sensibly) call “Little Blue Dots,” or LBDs (Figure 3).
LBDs: They ran out of food names
The LBDs don’t look much like other galaxies we’ve observed. They’re about 10,000 times less massive than the Milky Way, with stellar masses less than solar masses. But they’re also forming stars at an incredible pace—about 10,000 times faster than the Milky Way forms stars!
It’s hard to overstate how ridiculously quickly star formation is occurring in these galaxies. In fact, if the star formation rates have been constant, the galaxies must have formed within the last hundred million years or so. (That’s younger than the Earth!) Also,they must be very gas-rich in order to form stars so quickly, since gas is needed to form stars.
The LBDs weren’t just found in the local universe, either. Some LBDs (see Figure 4) were discovered up to redshifts of about 5, which corresponds to about 12.5 billion years ago. So what did these galaxies become as they evolved over time? (Yes, I know you can probably guess from the title of this post, but let’s at least see how the authors got to that conclusion.)
What? Your LBD is evolving!
The current paradigm of CDM cosmology predicts that large structures are built up from smaller building blocks, so maybe low-mass LBDs were the building blocks for the massive galaxies we see today? This very scenario has been seen in cosmological simulations, in which compact, highly star-forming galaxies called “blue nuggets” (another weird name, and one that isn’t even appetizing) evolve into massive quiescent galaxies. This might be a great model for LBDs… except these blue nuggets aren’t as intensely star-forming as the observed LBDs.
What if LBDs are instead the ancestors of less-massive galaxies, like local dwarf galaxies? Unfortunately, past star formation has been measured in some local dwarf galaxies (see here for one example)—and even when these dwarf galaxies were at their peak star formation rates, they weren’t quite as vigorously star forming as the LBDs seem to be.
This discrepancy might be because our measurements aren’t precise enough to measure very short bursts of star formation in whole dwarf galaxies. However, the strong bursts of star formation seen in LBDs could easily produce massive globular clusters within dwarf galaxies, even in a very short timescale.
The authors use some quick calculations to show that LBDs could produce globular clusters of up to a million solar masses, about the same as some of the most massive globular clusters observed in the nearby universe. Furthermore, the clusters produced by an LBD would make up a large fraction of the total stellar mass in the LBD, a scenario that’s consistent with what we see in local dwarf galaxies.
So there you have it: LBDs might be the progenitors of massive globular clusters! The evidence is a bit circumstantial, but it’s not a bad guess. More work will be needed to verify this link, and hopefully we’ll learn more about these strange galaxies along the way.