Title: The first interferometric detections of Fast Radio Bursts
Authors: M. Caleb, C. Flynn, M. Bailes, et al.
First Author’s Institution: Australian National University, ACT, Australia
Status: Published in MNRAS, open access
Fast Radio Bursts more commonly known as FRBs, have been a hot topic in recent years. These loud bursts of radio emissions appear in radio observation data at seemingly random times from random positions on the sky (see Fig. 1). Ever since the first FRB was found in archival data from the Parkes Observatory in Australia by Duncan Lorimer and his undergraduate student David Narkovic, we’ve seen an explosion in searches and resources devoted to finding more FRBs. The initial discovery of FRBs was highly scrutinized because unfortunately even astronomers can make mistakes. As of today, radio astronomers are trying to collect as much data on FRBs as possible to constrain all of the hypothesized origins of these extragalactic bursts of radio emissions.
Transient signals in our Radio Sky
FRBs are typically bright (high signal to noise), short lived (bursts on the order of milliseconds), and have a characteristic dispersion in frequency (meaning that they exist across multiple radio frequencies; an example of this can be seen in the Lorimer Burst). This dispersion in frequency is one way that can tell us that FRBs are not terrestrial , because it shows that the radio signal passed through a cold plasma, aka the Intergalactic Medium (IGM). This dispersion of an FRB signal can be quantified by the dispersion measure, DM. This relationship can be seen below, where is the dispersion constant, the beginning and the end observing frequencies, and the pulse width.
This quantity can also help us understand the properties of the IGM that the signal passed through, as DM can tell us about the electron density along its path. Now that we know the typical features of an FRB we can understand the type of instrument it takes to detect one. We need a radio telescope that has both high frequency and time resolution, and preferably one that has a lot of collecting area (this will translate to a higher sensitivity). This brings us to the radio interferometer used by the author’s of todays astrobite, the upgraded Molonglo Observatory Synthesis Telescope, or UTMOST. These upgrades allow for the improved detection of FRBs and coupled with the core MOST part of the telescope it has an ~ 8 field of view and 18,000 of collecting area. This means that UTMOST is pretty ideally situated to detect and survey for FRBs, and as we’ll now find out has already begun its job.
Catching FRBs in Radio Interferometers
Looking for FRBs isn’t easy, as can be seen from Figure 1, which demonstrates that there are no particular regions of the sky where they can be found. So being able to observe as much of the sky at any given moment can be extremely important. Our astrobite today highlights the first ever FRB detection in an interferometer (…actually the first 3!) over the course of 180 days of observing. The 3 UTMOST FRB detections can be seen in Figure 2, which are named FRB 160317, FRB 160410, and FRB 160608 (FRB naming convention is simple, it’s just FRB YYMMDD). In these initially detected FRBs they find the very characteristic burst width of 21 ms, 4 ms, 9 ms and dispersion measures of 1165 , 278 , 682 respectively. All three of these FRBs have DMs that are significantly higher than the dispersion you could expect from our own Milky Way (approx. 10-100 ), and thus the authors suggest that they must be from beyond our own galaxy. Additionally by extrapolating these 3 detections at the frequency of 843 MHz, they calculate that there should be 78 FRBs per day visible across the whole sky. This translates to approximately 0.02 FRBs per day when using UTMOST (due to it’s field of view). The all-sky FRB rate found with these 3 observations also goes counter to some of the most recent statistical understanding, as they appear to be almost a factor of 2 more than expected in the low frequency range. They suggest as a possible solution in light of these new detections that FRBs may exhibit a steeper spectral index than previously thought.
In addition to UTMOST in the Southern Hemisphere, the Canadian Hydrogen Intensity Mapping Experiment (CHIME) is currently being built in the Northern Hemisphere. While CHIMEs’ main purpose is the mapping of the 21cm cosmological signal it might be fit for FRB searches giving us an eye on the sky in the north. The current constraints on FRBs are still very much in their infancy, but with these newly minted radio interferometers (HIRAX too!) with much larger fields of view I think we can declare FRB hunting season open. Increasing the number of detections and bolstering our statistics of these extragalactic events will mean that we can eventually put the question of what causes an FRB to rest.
Fast Radio Bursts are natural chirped radio pulses, they acquired their chirp as the result of billions of light years travel through the intergalactic medium.
Chirps were evolved by Bats and Whales and are used by Submarines and radar to increase range resolution and to improve signal to noise ratio.
It is certain that there will be echoes of all FRBs from local stellar systems like Proxima and Alpha Century, the enormous distance of the FRB source will mean that all our nearby stellar systems will be illuminated by the same “Terrestrial” FRB and at the same time.
Many benefits will accrue from the use of FRBs as the signal source for a passive interstellar radar system but we will need to develop (or repurpose SETI processing) to be capable of raising the stellar system echoes of that FRB above cosmic and local noise.
It may be that achieving a FRB radar will be possible by applying Signal processing and advanced radio telescope receiver design and using the measurements already made on past FRB signal’s dispersion and diversity reception from multiple radio telescopes to raise the signal to noise ratio sufficiently to get information about atmospheres and the rotation rates of local stars and planets.
Terrestrial interstellar radar would have required enormous power and many years wait for the radar pulse round trip.
The use of an FRB which when generated would have had a cosmic magnitude has many advantages.
The particular FRB can be chosen so that its echo from the selected target system occurres close to our present time.
SETI radio telescopes should be ideal as radar receivers.
Re-purposing some as radar receivers will only be necessary for a brief period as the timing of the FRB echo will be known fairly accurately.
The availability of FRBs for interstellar radar may be more than serendipity! Perhaps the use of SETI receiver systems would be appropriate after all.