Title: Exploring Trans-Neptunian Space with TESS: A Targeted Shift-Stacking Search for Planet Nine and Distant TNOs in the Galactic Plane
Authors: M. Rice, G. Laughlin
First Author’s Institution: Department of Astronomy, Yale University, New Haven, CT
Status: Accepted to Planetary Science Journal, preprint on arxiv
The Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS), which just recently finished its primary mission to search for planets around nearby, bright stars, has also provided a treasure trove of other information for astronomers. As it stares at the sky, waiting to catch the brief flicker of a distant planet passing in front of its host star, TESS’ steady, unwavering gaze catches everything from stellar pulsations, to gamma-ray bursts, to distant solar system objects tumbling through the dark.
It has been hypothesized that among these distant solar system bodies lies a ninth planet orbiting our Sun. To date, searches for this hypothetical world have turned up little of interest, but with an expected size not much larger than the Earth, and an orbit that is thought to be ~10x as distant as Neptune, ‘planet nine’ would appear incredibly faint, due to the small amount of sunlight that reaches it. Furthermore, if it happens to lie near the star-studded galactic plane on the sky, it would be incredibly difficult to pick out in images.
An image of planet nine could be in some of the many exposures that TESS has already taken, although likely not in plain sight. Given TESS takes 30 minute exposures of each patch of sky, the signal from our distant solar system companion would probably be extremely weak. One way around this issue is to ‘stack’ multiple exposures on top of each other. This acts to boost the signal from any faint sources on an image above any background noise from the camera. Unfortunately, even the most distant solar system bodies move across the TESS field of view between exposures. Because the object is in a different place in each image, you lose any benefit from simply stacking the images on top of each other in place.
To get around this issue, the authors of today’s paper make use of a clever technique called ‘shift stacking’. Although an object will appear at a different location on each exposure, one can ‘shift’ the sequence of exposures in such a way that the same pixels on each image correspond to the location of the object. By doing so, the images can then be stacked and added together and an object too faint to be visible in a single image now pops out.
A diagram detailing this technique is shown in figure 1. The ‘shift stacking’ process described above is shown in the top panel. The tricky part, however, is when you don’t know what the path of the object you’re searching for actually follows. In this case, one can use a computer algorithm to ‘try out’ many different possible paths for the object (shown in the lower panel). The path which produces the strongest signal on the stacked image is likely the correct one.
Trying to guess the correct path for an undetected object can be slow ordeal. One simplification, however, makes this task much easier to conquer. Most outer solar system objects move incredibly slowly because they are so far from the sun. They move so slow, in fact, that their motion on the sky is almost entirely dominated by the Earth’s motion. This fact really helps to narrow down the range of possible guesses for the path of any undetected body. Because the Earth’s motion dominates, a body’s path across the images depends only on it’s distance from the sun, and not on the specific shape of its orbit.
To verify the effectiveness of this shift stacking technique, the authors first attempt to recover an image of three known outer solar system objects: Sedna, 2015 BP519 and 2007 TG 422. The resulting shift stacked images of these bodies are shown in the left column of figure 2. In these images, the object shows up as a bright point. Some of the shift stacked images also contain prominent streaks. It turns out that these are caused by much closer and brighter asteroids that happened to pass through the field of view of the telescope.
Next, the authors attempt to recover these three outer solar system bodies without telling the algorithm ahead of time about the trajectories of these bodies. Instead, the algorithm tries to guess the path by maximizing the brightness of the point source in the shift stacked images. This is shown in the middle and right hand columns of figure 2. Here, ‘polynomial’ and ‘PCA’ refer to the technique used to subtract the baseline flux from the images. Although the polynomial technique is less computationally expensive, it sometimes results in the object itself being removed from the images.
Lastly, the authors apply their blind search algorithm to TESS sectors 18 and 19. Although this is only a small piece of the observing footprint of the telescope, these two sectors partially overlap with the galactic plane, which is where the shift stacking technique is particularly useful. In total, the authors provide a list of 17 new outer solar system body candidates, which will need to be followed up with ground-based observations to confirm. From the TESS images, the distance, brightness and size of the objects are estimated. Unfortunately, none appear anywhere near as large as what is expected for the hypothetical planet nine. It is, however, exciting that this technique finds so many new candidate objects from such a small search area. Presently, there are only about 100 known distant outer solar system bodies! Although this technique is quite computationally expensive to run, a more clever implementation that involves convolutional neural networks could allow this to be run on the entire sky.
Astrobite edited by Bryanne McDonough
Featured image credit: Figure 1 from paper