Simulating the unseen: learning about Jupiter’s unknown impactor through simulations
The impact of comet Shoemaker-Levy 9 was a remarkable event: in 1994, a comet, torn into pieces during a close approach with Jupiter two years prior, crashed into Jupiter. It was the first collision between two solar system bodies to ever be observed, and the effects on Jupiter’s atmosphere (see the figure below) were visible for months. At the time, Harrington et al. (2004) predicted that it would be hundreds of years before such an event occurred again. But two and a half years ago, another object collided with Jupiter. No one witnessed the collision, but amateur astronomer A. Wesley noticed a dark streak with properties closely matching those seen after the impact of SL-9. Because of these similarities, it is believed that this feature was the result of an impact.
Unplugging the “Christmas tree”: what happened to high-redshift clumps of star formation?
The lack of observed major mergers at high-redshift has prompted discussion of inside-out growth, that is, galaxies building up their stellar populations by cold gas accretion, starting in the inner regions and gradually moving outwards. This picture is far from settled, however, and so the authors of this paper set out to investigate whether or not the observations match the theory.
Finding dust grains (and planetesimals?) in a circumstellar disk
AU Mic is a low mass star that undergoes unpredictable brightening events, called flares. It’s located just 10pc and has a circumstellar disk. In this paper, Wilner et al. report on observations of the disk at millimeter wavelengths and find evidence for a planetesimal ring.
Have the tides turned for the formation of cE galaxies?
A specific class of elliptical galaxies called compact ellipticals, or cEs, are unusually compressed. Some speculate that these galaxies are petite because their outer layers have been stripped away by a neighboring galaxy; however, an alternative theory claims that these are regular elliptical galaxies that simply formed small and never contained stars in their outer regions. In order to differentiate between these two models, Howley et al. 2012 measured the dynamics of individual stars in one of our nearest neighbors, the compact elliptical M32.
And now there’s a problem with M dwarfs, too
The basis for something called the “G dwarf problem” is the comparison between observations and a simple model for chemical evolution in a galaxy. To cut to the chase, there are fewer very metal poor G dwarfs than are predicted by this basic understanding. This discrepancy has been shown to hold for the Milky Way as well as for other galaxies. It also holds for K dwarfs in the Milky Way – and now for M dwarfs as well.