**Title:**Planet Occurrence within 0.25 AU of Solar-Type Stars from Kepler**Authors:**Andrew Howard and the rest of the Kepler Team**First Author’s Institution:**UC Berkeley

The Kepler mission is hot right now, having just released it’s largest data set ever last month (see this astrobite for discussion about the data release and this one for a good overview of the mission). One of the main aims of Kepler is to get statistics on exoplanets. How rare are they? Which stars have the most planets? What sized planets are most common? How far away are they from their host star? In the latest paper to be published by the Kepler Science Team, Howard et al. attempt to begin to answer some of these questions by analyzing the trends in the published data.

**Methods**

In order to reduce systematic effects in their statistical analysis, the authors first limit their sample to the brightest half of the stars in the Kepler field. Within that sample, they then consider only main sequence stars with effective temperatures between 4100 and 6100 K. These criteria result in a sample that is roughly one third of the total Kepler sample.

They only consider planets that are larger than two Earth radii on orbits shorter than 50 days. By selecting these planets, they ensure that they have a ‘complete sample’; that is, they should not be systematically missing planets in a way that would skew their statistics.

**Results**

The authors find a few interesting key results:

- They find that the number of small planets is greater than the number of larger planets, and that this correlation roughly follows a power law. This pattern is shown in Figure 1.
- They plot the period of the planet orbits against the number of planets and find that the number of planets increases as a function of increasing period for all mass bins. The best fit models have a characteristic cutoff period which is different for different sized planets, suggesting that migration could be a function of planetary radius.

- One puzzling statistic is that the occurrence of hot Jupiters (giant planets in orbits very close to the star) is much lower in the Kepler field than has been found from doing similar statistical studies on radial velocity surveys.
- Another very interesting suggestion from this study is that cooler stars appear to have more planets. Figure 3 shows that the number of planets found declines with increasing stellar temperature. In fact, the coolest stars discussed, M dwarfs, were 7 times more likely to have a planet than the hottest! This is a big claim, so the authors are careful to show that this correlation could not be caused by random errors (by performing Monte Carlo simulations) and account for two different systematic biases in the data.

**Conclusions**

The authors have begun to answer some of the most fundamental questions we can ask about planets for the subset of Kepler data currently available. The results published in this paper are interesting because these statistics give theorists an insight into planetary formation and migration mechanisms. Models should be able to reproduce the distributions of planets that we observe, so measuring these distributions well allows us to determine which models fit the data best.

These types of statistics, as they are extended for smaller planets in wider orbits, will eventually allow us to constrain how the solar system formed and understand just how rare our own Earth might be.

### Discover more from astrobites

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

Another key result that has come out of this immense new data set is the elimination of the curious void of small planets in small orbits “the planet desert” that appears in solitary planet formation simulations. (See the astrobites summary). A paper by Howard et al. in October found many small planets close into the star using the radial velocity method and suggested that the planet desert idea be revisited. Kepler has added many more planets to this zone further backing up the notion that something is funny with the simulations.

A mind boggling thought is that it is likely that there are more planets than stars out there in the Universe.