Supermassive Black Hole Binaries Two Ways

by | Oct 16, 2020 | Daily Paper Summaries | 0 comments

Title: Multimessenger pulsar timing array constraints on supermassive black hole binaries traced by periodic light curves

Authors: Chengcheng Xin, Chiara M. F. Mingarelli, Jeffrey S. Hazboun

First Author’s Institution: Columbia University, Department of Astronomy, 550 West 120th Street, New York, NY, 10027, USA

Status: Submitted to ApJ

Disclaimer: I am a member of the NANOGrav collaboration but was not involved in this work.

This year’s Nobel Prize in Physics was, in part, awarded to Andrea Ghez and Reinhard Genzel for their discovery of the supermassive black hole (SMBH) at the center of the Milky Way. This was an amazing discovery, and has led many astronomers, including the authors of today’s paper, to look for SMBHs in other galaxies. However the authors of today’s paper are looking not for a single SMBH, but for supermassive black hole binary systems (SMBHBs) which may be formed when two galaxies merge. To do this, they utilize multimessenger astrophysics. First they analyze electromagnetic observations to identify candidate SMBHBs. Then they determine the strength of the gravitational waves emitted by the orbits of these SMBHBs, and predict if they will be detectable with current and future pulsar timing arrays.

Combing for Candidates

Some SMBHBs candidates belong to a class called active galactic nuclei , or AGN, which emit massive amounts of energy that we observe as electromagnetic waves. As the SMBHBs orbit each other, they can cause periodic changes in the brightness, or magnitude, of the light emitted over time. This time-variable light emission is known as a light curve. Many large scale surveys such as the SDSS V or the Catalina Real-Time Transient Survey (CRTS) regularly monitor the light from sources across the sky, resulting in light curves from potential SMBHB sources that span years, like that shown in Figure 1.

Two light curves from potential supermassive black hole binary candidates. Black points show that the optical magnitude varies periodically over many years.
Figure 1: The optical magnitude, or optical brightness, of two supermassive black hole binary candidates analyzed by the authors of this paper over time, here in units of Modified Julian Date, or MJD, where one unit is one day. Each point is one measurement. You can clearly see the periodic variability of these SMBHB candidates shown by the blue curves. Figure 4 in the paper.

The authors of today’s paper compile a total of 149 of these SMBHB candidates from various catalogs, and then use the source’s distance and masses to predict the frequency and strength, or strain, of the gravitational waves that may be emitted by the binary.

A Galaxy Sized Gravitational Wave Detector

The gravitational waves emitted by SMBHBs will not be like those that have been detected by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (or LIGO), which are emitted at frequencies between 10 and 10,000 Hz. These will be emitted at nanohertz frequencies, which means these binaries will take years to complete one orbit. We can’t detect these low frequency gravitational waves with ground based detectors, so instead we use pulsar timing arrays. Pulsars are neutron stars that emit radio pulses that can be timed, or have their time of arrival at Earth predicted, extremely precisely. As the gravitational waves from these SMBHBs pass between Earth and the pulsar, they will squeeze and stretch the space, making the pulses arrive slightly earlier or later, then predicted. This signal will be different in each pulsar depending on where it is in space, and is discussed in more detail in this astrobite.

Current pulsar timing array experiments such as those done by North American Nanohertz Observatory for Gravitational Waves (NANOGrav), the European Pulsar Timing Array (EPTA), and the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array (PPTA), which collectively make up the International Pulsar Timing Array (IPTA), all regularly search their data for these individual sources of gravitational waves, but none have been found so far. This makes searching for potential candidates for gravitational wave detection through mulitmessenger methods crucial for these experiments.

Pulsar timing array sensitivity curves showing the predicted sensitivity of future pulsar timing arrays compared to the predicted gravitational wave strain of candidates supermassive black hole binary sources. Two very close candidates are above future SKA pulsar timing array curves showing they may be detectable. Other candidates are scattered around the SKA2 pulsar timing array curves show that more candidates may be detectable through gravitational wave emission far in the future.
Figure 2: Each point shows the strength, or strain, and frequency of the gravitational waves expected to be emitted by an SMBHB candidate. The purple points are two of the most promising candidates. The dotted black line shows the most recent published sensitivity of NANOGrav to these sources, and the subsequent lines show the predicted sensitivity of each of these pulsar timing arrays in the future. If a point lies above one of the lines, its gravitational wave emission may be detected by that pulsar timing array. Adapted from Figure 1 in the paper.

Predicting the Future

The authors of this paper use previous limits set by these pulsar timing arrays, and then use models to extrapolate how sensitive they might be in the future, with particular attention to the IPTA and the Square Kilometer Array (SKA), an array of radio telescopes currently being built which is expected to find and time hundreds of pulsars. The authors then look to see if any of their most promising SMBHB candidates will be detectable in the future, shown in Figure 2 by the candidate points and sensitivity curves and in Figure 3 by the gravitational wave strain needed for the pulsar timing array to detect the source with a signal-to-noise greater than 3 in different parts of the sky. We can see from both of these figures that some SMBHB candidates very well might be detectable, though not for at least a few more years.

Four different maps of the sky for different pulsar timing arrays showing the location and number of the pulsars predicted in the pulsar timing array, how sensitive the array is at different locations in the sky, and the location on the sky of the four most likely sources. As future pulsar timing arrays add more timing data and pulsars, the sky maps show the sensitivity to gravitational wave sources increasing by two orders of magnitude, suggesting these candidates supermassive binary black hole sources will be detected in the future.
Figure 3: All sky map showing the gravitational wave strain needed for the pulsar timing array, current or future, to detect the source with a signal-to-noise greater than 3. Each white dot shows one pulsar in or predicted to be in the array, and the orange and purple shapes show the strongest gravitational wave candidates found in the sample in this paper. Lighter colors represent lower strain, or weaker signal necessary, as noted in the color bar below each map. As the pulsar timing arrays add more pulsars across the sky, they get more and more sensitive, indicating that they might detect gravitational waves from one of these candidates by the late 2020’s! Figure 2 from the paper.

Being able to identify and predict the detectability of potential SMBHB candidates from light curves is crucial for confirming them in the future, as gravitational wave emission is an undeniable signature that the candidate really is a SMBHB. With telescopes like the Vera Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) coming online soon, more and more of these candidates will be identified by their light curves. Finding these candidates also allows for targeted gravitational wave searches which may increase the sensitivity by a factor of two! This paper has helped lay the groundwork for multimessenger astronomy as a critical component for detecting SMBHBs in future pulsar timing array data, and shows there is a lot to look forward to!

Astrobite edited by: Abby Waggoner

Featured image credit: AUI/NRAO, NAOJ, and Science/Nicole Rager Fuller

Author

  • Brent Shapiro-Albert

    I’m a fourth year graduate student at West Virginia University studying various aspects of pulsars. I’m a member of the NANOGrav collaboration which uses pulsar timing arrays to detect gravitational waves. In particular I study how the interstellar medium affects the pulsar emission. Other than research I enjoy reading, hiking, and video games.

    View all posts

Discover more from astrobites

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Leave a Reply